4.7 Article

Stochastic Model-Predictive Control for Lane Change Decision of Automated Driving Vehicles

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 67, 期 6, 页码 4771-4782

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2804891

关键词

Automated driving control; lane change decision; real-time implementation; stochastic model predictive control; vehicle test

资金

  1. Institute of Advanced Machines and Design, Seoul National University
  2. Brain Korea 21 program [F14SN02D1310]
  3. Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport
  4. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement [16PTSI-C054118-08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes lane change motion planning with a combination of probabilistic and deterministic prediction for automated driving under complex driving circumstances. The autonomous lane change should arrive safely at the destination. The subject vehicle needs to perceive and predict the behaviors of other vehicles with sensors. From the information of other vehicles, a collision probability is defined using a reachable set of uncertainty propagation. In addition, the lane change risk is monitored using predicted time-to-collision and safety distance to guarantee safety in lane change behavior. A safe driving envelope is defined as constraints based on the combinatorial prediction (probabilistic and deterministic) of the behavior of surrounding vehicles. To obtain the desired steering angle and longitudinal acceleration to maintain the automated driving vehicle under constraints, a stochastic model-predictive control problem is formulated. The proposed model has been evaluated by performing lane change simulations in MATLAB/Simulink, while considering the effect of combination prediction. Also, the proposed algorithm has been implemented on a test vehicle. The simulation and test results show that the proposed algorithm can handle complicated lane change scenarios, while guaranteeing safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据