4.6 Article

Bellwethers: A Baseline Method for Transfer Learning

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
卷 45, 期 11, 页码 1081-1105

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2018.2821670

关键词

Estimation; Software; Software engineering; Task analysis; Benchmark testing; Complexity theory; Analytical models; Transfer learning; defect prediction; bad smells; issue close time; effort estimation; prediction

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [1506586, 1302169]
  2. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1302169] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1506586] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Software analytics builds quality prediction models for software projects. Experience shows that (a) the more projects studied, the more varied are the conclusions; and (b) project managers lose faith in the results of software analytics if those results keep changing. To reduce this conclusion instability, we propose the use of bellwethers: given N projects from a community the bellwether is the project whose data yields the best predictions on all others. The bellwethers offer a way to mitigate conclusion instability because conclusions about a community are stable as long as this bellwether continues as the best oracle. Bellwethers are also simple to discover (just wrap a for-loop around standard data miners). When compared to other transfer learning methods (TCA+, transfer Naive Bayes, value cognitive boosting), using just the bellwether data to construct a simple transfer learner yields comparable predictions. Further, bellwethers appear in many SE tasks such as defect prediction, effort estimation, and bad smell detection. We hence recommend using bellwethers as a baseline method for transfer learning against which future work should be compared.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据