4.7 Article

Field Verification of Frequency Control by Energy-Intensive Loads for Isolated Power Systems With High Penetration of Wind Power

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 6098-6108

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2834520

关键词

Energy-intensive load; field test; isolated power system; high penetration of wind power; load frequency control; hardware-in-the-loop simulation

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0902900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51477122/51707136]
  3. Technology Project of State Grid Corporation of China [5215001600ur]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Frequency control of isolated power systems with high penetration of wind power is a challenging task for system operators. The difficulty results from the limited frequency response capability of thermal power units to keep up with the fluctuations of wind power. This paper develops a field verification architecture to leverage aluminum smelting loads (ASLs) to participate in primary frequency control. A new method is proposed to coordinate ASLs with thermal power units to quickly stabilize the isolated power system with significant wind power fluctuations or curtailments. Moreover, a closed-loop control system for the ASLs controller is developed and tested on a real-world isolated power system in Inner Mongolia, China. Hardware-in-the-loop simulations, as well as field tests, are conducted under various scenarios of wind power fluctuations or curtailments to verify the proposed architecture for frequency control. The highly consistent simulation results and field tests demonstrate the good frequency control capability of the ASL. The regulated power from the ASL is demonstrated to be able to reach 6% of its rated power within 4 s. Working jointly with thermal power units, the ASL helps maintain the stable operation of the isolated power system, significantly improving the frequency response characteristic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据