4.6 Article

An Isolated Resonant Mode Modular Converter With Flexible Modulation and Variety of Configurations for MVDC Application

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 508-519

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2017.2735634

关键词

Modular multilevel converter; resonant dc-dc conversion; dc tap; dc transformer; MVDC

资金

  1. Reconfigurable Distribution Networks Project under EPSRC [EP/K036327/1]
  2. Enhanced Renewable Integration through Flexible Transmission Options Project under EPSRC [EP/K006312/1]
  3. Delta Foundation [DREG2016009]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K036327/1, EP/K006312/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/K036327/1, EP/K006312/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dc tap or dc transformer will play an important role in interfacing different voltages of dc links in dc grids. This paper presents an isolated resonant mode modular converter (RMMC) with flexible modulation and assorted configurations to satisfy a wide variety of interface requirements for medium-voltage dc (MVdc) networks. The transformerless RMMC, as introduced in the literature, implemented a restricted modulation scheme leading to a very limited range of step ratio and the diode rectifier resulted in unidirectional power flow. Both of these limitations are removed in this proposal and galvanic isolation has also been added. Moreover, this new RMMC approach can serve as a building block for variety of configurations. Two such derived topologies are given, which inherently balance the voltage and current between different constituent circuits and realize the high power rating conversion for very low or very high step-ratio application. The theoretical analysis is validated by a set of full-scale simulations and a downscaled experimental prototype. The results illustrate that this isolated RMMC and its derivatives have promising features for dc taps or dc transformers in MVdc applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据