3.8 Article

Women's career advancement: mentoring and networking in Saudi Arabia and the UK

期刊

HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 153-168

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2015.1026548

关键词

mentoring; networking; career advancement; women; Saudi Arabia; United Kingdom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on women managers' perceptions of mentoring and networking with respect to their career development in Saudi Arabia (SA) and the UK. This qualitative study used interviews to generate data, and we interviewed 44 women working as managers in public sector organizations in SA and the UK. The findings revealed that women in SA and the UK have different concepts of both mentoring and networking, and this relates to the cultures in the two countries. Women in SA associated mentoring and networking with their family members rather than their professional networks. In contrast, the women in the UK conceptualized mentoring and networking as something that took place, either formally or informally, in the workplace or through their wider professional networks. Both groups of women experienced challenges in their careers and received different forms of support from their professional groups and family members. Our comparative study provides a novel insight into women's experiences from two very different perspectives and cultures; this will contribute to research and practice in this area. In particular, the findings illustrate the importance for human resource practitioners and talent managers of understanding the cultural context of their management and leadership development interventions. The paper concludes with an agenda for further research and also identifies the implications for human resource development practitioners which include adapting their strategies and practices to enable organizations to gain full value from their talent pool and realize women's potential to hold top positions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据