4.7 Article

Semi-Supervised Image Classification With Self-Paced Cross-Task Networks

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 851-865

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2017.2758522

关键词

Image classification; semi-supervised learning; cross-task network; self-paced paradigm

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61502173, 61572199, 61722205]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A030310422]
  3. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region [CityU 11300715]
  4. City University of Hong Kong [7004674]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a semi-supervised setting, direct training of a deep discriminative model on partially labeled images often suffers from overfitting and poor performance, because only a small number of labeled images are available, and errors in label propagation are, in many cases, inevitable. In this paper, we introduce an auxiliary clustering task to explore the structure of the image data, and judiciously weigh unlabeled data to alleviate the influence of ambiguous data on model training. For this purpose, we propose a cross-task network composed of two streams to jointly learn two tasks: classification and clustering. Based on the model predictions, a large number of pairwise constraints can be generated from unlabeled images, and are fed to the clustering stream. Since pairwise constraints encode weak supervision information, the clustering is tolerant of errors in labeling. Unlabeled images are weighted according to the distances to the clusters discovered, and a better discriminative model is trained on the classification stream associated with a weighted softmax loss. Furthermore, a self-paced learning paradigm is adopted to gradually train our deep model from easy examples to difficult ones. Experimental results on widely used image classification datasets confirm the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据