4.7 Article

Toward Ultra-Low-Power Remote Health Monitoring: An Optimal and Adaptive Compressed Sensing Framework for Activity Recognition

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 658-673

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2018.2843373

关键词

Compressed sensing; activity recognition; feature selection; energy efficiency; ultra-low power; optimization; adaptive

资金

  1. EU (FEDER)
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [TIN2015-65277-R, TEC2012-33892]
  3. US National Science Foundation [CNS-1566359]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activity recognition, as an important component of behavioral monitoring and intervention, has attracted enormous attention, especially in Mobile Cloud Computing (MCC) and Remote Health Monitoring (RHM) paradigms. While recently resource constrained wearable devices have been gaining popularity, their battery life is limited and constrained by the frequent wireless transmission of data to more computationally powerful back-ends. This paper proposes an ultra-low power activity recognition system using a novel adaptive compressed sensing technique that aims to minimize transmission costs. Coarse-grained on-body sensor localization and unsupervised clustering modules are devised to autonomously reconfigure the compressed sensing module for further power saving. We perform a thorough heuristic optimization using Grammatical Evolution (GE) to ensure minimal computation overhead of the proposed methodology. Our evaluation on a real-world dataset and a low power wearable sensing node demonstrates that our approach can reduce the energy consumption of the wireless data transmission up to 81.2 and 61.5 percent, with up to 60.6 and 35.0 percent overall power savings in comparison with baseline and a naive state-of-the-art approaches, respectively. These solutions lead to an average activity recognition accuracy of 89.0 percent-only 4.8 percent less than the baseline accuracy-while having a negligible energy overhead of on-node computation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据