3.8 Article

The influence of green advertising during a corporate disaster

期刊

CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 256-275

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-08-2014-0055

关键词

Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Marketing strategy; British Petroleum; Cause-related marketing (CRM); Green advertising; Oil spill; Advertising campaign; Corporate disaster

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore influences of green advertising and social activism during one of the worst adverse public relations episodes in history: the British Petroleum (BP) Deep Water Horizon oil spill. Design/methodology/approach - The study uses self-congruency theory and perception of fit to explore the influence of green advertising and social activism on attitudes toward BP's advertising, commitment to the environment, brand, and company. The survey data cover periods before, during, and after the spill. Findings - Mean ratings for the BP brand were lower during the oil spill for respondents who viewed an environmental ad as compared to those viewing an ad lacking environmental content. Comparison of attitudes toward BP's environmental commitment, advertising, company, and brand reveal differences between activist and non-activist respondents across all four attitudinal scales during the oil spill. Practical implications - The study finds that lack of fit between corporate social responsibility communications and social responsibility performance raises the potential for a significant backlash against BP. Originality/value - The paper utilizes unique data that include survey responses before during and after the BP Deep Water Horizon oil spill. Empirical analyses of attitudes toward advertising, company, and brand over the life cycle of an adverse public relations event are among the first of their kind. Similarly, analyses of differences in activist and non-activist attitudes toward a company operating in a high-environmental risk industry are also among the first ever.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据