4.7 Article

Physical Layer Security in Buffer-State-Based Max-Ratio Relay Selection Exploiting Broadcasting With Cooperative Beamforming and Jamming

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2018.2854711

关键词

Broadcast; buffers; cooperative communications; delay-tolerant network; Markov chain; packet delay; physical layer security; secrecy capacity; secrecy outage probability; spatial diversity

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [26709028, 16KK0120, 17H03259]
  2. Telecommunications Advancement Foundation
  3. Nakajima Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H03259] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we propose a novel secure buffer-aided decode-and-forward relay selection that amalgamates the benefits of the buffer-state-based relay selection, the max-ratio criterion, the simultaneous activation of multiple source-to-relay links, and the cooperative beamforming in dual-hop networks. More specifically, the proposed scheme is designed for selecting a single or multiple relay nodes for packet reception or transmission based on the buffer states of relay nodes, while avoiding the detrimental effects of both an empty buffer state and a buffer overflow. Analytical bounds on the secrecy outage probability and the average delay are derived for our proposed scheme, based on a Markov chain process, in order to verify the system model of our proposed scheme. Furthermore, we introduce the concept of cooperative jamming into the proposed scheme, in order to interfere with an eavesdropper's reception, while dispensing with the full channel state information associated with an eavesdropper at a central coordinator. Our simulation results demonstrate that the proposed schemes outperform the existing buffer-based secure relay selection schemes, in terms of both the secrecy outage probability and the average delay, as the explicit benefits of our novel introduced concepts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据