4.7 Article

Ranking-Based Locality Sensitive Hashing-Enabled Cancelable Biometrics: Index-of-Max Hashing

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2017.2753172

关键词

Fingerprint; cancelable template; Index-of-Max hashing; security and privacy

资金

  1. Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (IITP) through Korean Government (MSIT) [2016-0-00097]
  2. Institute for Information & Communication Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP), Republic of Korea [2016-0-00097-003] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we propose a ranking-based locality sensitive hashing inspired two-factor cancelable biometrics, dubbed Index-of-Max (IoM) hashing for biometric template protection. With externally generated random parameters, IoM hashing transforms a real-valued biometric feature vector into discrete index (max ranked) hashed code. We demonstrate two realizations from IoM hashing notion, namely, Gaussian random projection-based and uniformly random permutation-based hashing schemes. The discrete indices representation nature of IoM hashed codes enjoys several merits. First, IoM hashing empowers strong concealment to the biometric information. This contributes to the solid ground of non-invertibility guarantee. Second, IoM hashing is insensitive to the features magnitude, hence is more robust against biometric features variation. Third, the magnitude-independence trait of IoM hashing makes the hash codes being scale-invariant, which is critical for matching and feature alignment. The experimental results demonstrate favorable accuracy performance on benchmark FVC2002 and FVC2004 fingerprint databases. The analyses justify its resilience to the existing and newly introduced security and privacy attacks as well as satisfy the revocability and unlinkability criteria of cancelable biometrics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据