4.6 Article

Delaying aging is neuroprotective in Parkinson's disease: a genetic analysis in C. elegans models

期刊

NPJ PARKINSONS DISEASE
卷 1, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/npjparkd.2015.22

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs [P40OD010440]
  2. Van Andel Research Institute
  3. Parkinson Society of Canada
  4. Van Andel Institute Graduate School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aging is the greatest risk factor for the development of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the role of aging in the pathogenesis of PD is not known and it is currently uncertain why the symptoms take many decades to develop when inherited mutations that cause the disease can be present from birth. We hypothesize that there are specific changes that take place during the aging process that make cells susceptible to disease-causing mutations that are well-tolerated at younger ages. If so, then interventions that increase lifespan should be beneficial in the treatment of PD. To test this hypothesis, we used the powerful genetics of C. elegans, as this worm has been used extensively in aging research. We crossed transgenic worm models of PD expressing either human mutant a-synuclein (A53T) or LRRK2 (G20195) with the long-lived insulin-IGF1 receptor mutant, daf-2. The daf-2 mutation increased the lifespan of both PD mutants. The increase in lifespan resulting from the daf-2 mutation rescued the degeneration of dopamine neurons in both worm models of PD and importantly rescued deficits in dopamine-dependent behaviors including basal slowing, ethanol avoidance, and area-restricted searching. Increasing lifespan through daf-2 mutation also delayed the formation of small aggregates in a worm model of PD expressing a-synuclein in the body wall muscle and rescued deficits in resistance to different stresses that were present in the PD mutant worms. Overall, this work suggests that slowing down the aging process may provide an effective treatment for PD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据