3.8 Article

FoxP3

期刊

EGYPTIAN RHEUMATOLOGIST
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 7-15

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejr.2014.06.004

关键词

Rheumatoid arthritis; Tregs; FoxP3; TGF-beta; IL-17; TGF-beta/IL-17 ratio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim of the work: To investigate the frequency of FoxP3 + CD4 + CD25 + high cells (Tregs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and their association with clinical and radiological parameters. Also to study the possible relationship between Tregs and TGF-beta as an indicator of Treg function, with IL17 as an indicator of Th17 function and with the ratio between them to throw light on the imbalance between these two cytokines in RA. Patients and methods: Forty RA patients and 20 age and sex matched healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Patients underwent clinical, laboratory and radiographic assessment. The frequency of Tregs was determined by flowcytometry. Serum IL-17 and TGF-beta cytokines were analyzed using ELISA. Results: The frequency of Tregs was significantly decreased among RA patients and with a parallel significant decrease in the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of FoxP3. Both IL-17 and TGF-beta were significantly increased. Tregs, IL-17 and TGF-beta did not correlate with any of the clinical findings, laboratory and radiographic scores. TGFb: IL-17 ratio dropped from 15.8 +/- 9.6 among controls to 5.33 +/- 5 among patients with mild-to-moderate activity and 2.45 +/- 1.8 among patients with severe activity. Conclusion: RA patients show a decreased frequency of Tregs that is not associated with clinical parameters or radiological damage. The five-fold increase in IL-17 and two-fold increase in TGF-beta prove a disturbance in the balance of the cytokine milieu in favor of inflammation and draw attention to the importance of considering the interplay of the Treg/ TH17 cytokine axis in the pathogenesis of RA; hence aiming at restoring that balance during treatment. (C) 2014 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Egyptian Society of Rheumatic Diseases. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据