4.4 Article

Understanding the usage of global social networking sites by Arabs through the lens of uses and gratifications theory

期刊

JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 662-680

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JOSM-01-2015-0037

关键词

Gender; Social interaction; Enjoyment; Saudi Arabia; Self-presentation; Twitter usage

资金

  1. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to increase understanding of the determinants and usage of global technology services in Saudi Arabia. The technology under investigation is social network technology, Twitter. Design/methodology/approach - Drawing upon relevant extant literature, the paper proposes a research model, which examines the relationship between personal and social factors and usage of Twitter, as well as the moderating effects of gender and user experience. Data were collected online from 281 Saudi Twitter users, and the research model was empirically tested using standard procedures. Findings - The findings support some of the proposed direct and moderating effects. For example, enjoyment, freedom of expression, and social interaction were found to influence Twitter usage. Gender as well as user experience has a moderating effect in the relationship between self-presentation and usage. Research limitations/implications - The proposed framework contributes to global (technology) services management and marketing research by integrating personal and social factors, and demographics as direct and contingent factors in understanding user acceptance of social network technologies in the Arab region. Detailed discussions of the research, managerial and contextual implications conclude the paper. Originality/value - The personal and social motives behind the use of social network sites in the Arab region particularly Saudi Arabia is ill understood due to a dearth of research on the region. This paper helps to bridge this research and knowledge gap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据