4.8 Article

Efficient Transient Stability Analysis of Electrical Power System Based on a Spatially Paralleled Hybrid Approach

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 1460-1473

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2018.2844298

关键词

Block bordered diagonal form (BBDF); high-order Taylor series algorithm; spatially paralleled hybrid approach; transient stability analysis

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [3174057]
  2. Support Program for the Excellent Talents in Beijing City [2016000020124G079]
  3. Hong Kong Polytechnic University for the Start-up Fund Research Project [1-ZE68]
  4. Research Grant Council (HK) for the Early Career Scheme Grant Research Project [25203917]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016MS14]
  6. Project of State Grid Corporation of China [5230HQ16000A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With continually increasing complexities of power systems, transient stability analysis as an important task for system security operation becomes very time consuming and thus an efficient analysis tool is urgently needed. In this paper, a spatially paralleled hybrid approach combining the high-order Taylor series algorithm and the block bordered diagonal form (BBDF) was proposed to improve the computational efficiency of power system transient stability analysis. The proposed approach only exchanged high-order derivatives of generator voltages and currents between partitioned power network subsystems and the coordinated-bus cluster based on BBDF, and enhanced the triangular factorization recursive utilization rate of admittance matrix using the Taylor series algorithm with a large integration step. Finally, the proposed spatially paralleled hybrid approach was tested in the New England 39-bus, IEEE 145-bus and an expanded 580-bus systems, and simulation results have validated the proposed approach is very effective and computationally efficient for power system transient stability analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据