4.8 Article

Energy-Delay Tradeoff for Dynamic Offloading in Mobile-Edge Computing System With Energy Harvesting Devices

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 4642-4655

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2018.2843365

关键词

Energy-delay tradeoff; energy harvesting (EH); Lyapunov optimization; mobile-edge computing (MEC); online dynamic offloading

资金

  1. NSF of China [61772130, 61473189, 61301118]
  2. International S&T Cooperation Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [15220710600]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [17ZR1445200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mobile-edge computing (MEC) has aroused significant attention for its performance to accelerate application's operation and enrich user's experience. With the increasing development of green computing, energy harvesting (EH) is considered as an available technology to capture energy from circumambient environment to supply extra energy for mobile devices. In this paper, we propose an online dynamic tasks assignment scheduling to investigate the tradeoff between energy consumption and execution delay for an MEC system with EH capability. We formulate it into an average weighted sum of energy consumption and execution delay minimization problem of mobile device with the stability of buffer queues and battery level as constraints. Based on the Lyapunov optimization method, we obtain the optimal scheduling about the CPU-cycle frequencies of mobile device and transmit power for data transmission. Besides, the dynamic online tasks offloading strategy is developed to modify the data backlogs of queues. The performance analysis shows the stability of the battery energy level and the tradeoff between energy consumption and execution delay. Moreover, the MEC system with EH devices and task buffers implements the high energy efficient and low latency communications. The performance of the proposed online algorithm is validated with extensive trace-driven simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据