4.8 Article

A New Family of Model-Based Impulsive Wavelets and Their Sparse Representation for Rolling Bearing Fault Diagnosis

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 65, 期 3, 页码 2716-2726

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2017.2736510

关键词

Convex optimization; dictionary; fault detection; inverse wavelet transform; iterative shrinking algorithm; weak impulsive feature extraction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675065]
  2. Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology [cstc2017jcyjAX0459]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The localized faults of rolling bearings can be diagnosed by the extraction of the impulsive feature. However, the approximately periodic impulses may be submerged in strong interferences generated by other components and the background noise. To address this issue, this paper explores a new impulsive feature extraction method based on the sparse representation. According to the vibration model of an impulse generated by the bearing fault, a novel impulsive wavelet is constructed, which satisfies the admissibility condition. As a result, this family of model-based impulsive wavelets can form a Parseval frame. With the model-based impulsive wavelet basis and Fourier basis, a convex optimization problem is formulated to extract the repetitive impulses. Based on the splitting idea, an iterative thresholding shrinkage algorithm is proposed to solve this problem, and it has a fast convergence rate. Via the simulated signal and real vibration signals with bearing fault information, the performance of the proposed approach for repetitive impulsive feature extraction is validated and compared with the noted spectral kurtosis method, the optimized spectral kurtosis method based on simulated annealing, and the resonance-based signal decomposition method. The results demonstrate its advantage and superiority in weak repetitive transient feature extraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据