4.8 Article

A Compact Modular Multilevel DC-DC Converter for High Step-Ratio MV and HV Use

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 65, 期 9, 页码 7060-7071

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2793249

关键词

Compact volume; dc grids; high step-ratio; modular multilevel converter (MMC)

资金

  1. Reconfigurable Distribution Networks project under EPSRC [EP/K036327/1]
  2. Delta Foundation [DREG2016009]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K036327/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/K036327/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In multi-terminal dc networks or future dc grids, there is an important role for high step-ratio dcdc conversion to interface a high-voltage network to lower voltage infeeds or offtakes. The efficiency and controllability of dc-dc conversion will be expected to be similar to modular multilevel ac-dc converters. This paper presents a modular multilevel dc-dc converter with a high stepratio for medium-voltage and high-voltage applications. Its topology on the high-voltage side is derived from the halfbridge single-phase inverter with stacks of sub-modules (SMs) replacing each of the switch positions. A near-squarewave current operation is proposed, which achieves nearconstant instantaneous power for single-phase conversion, leading to reduced stack capacitor and filter volume and also increasing the power device utilization. A controller for energy balancing and current tracking is designed. The soft-switching operation on the low-voltage side is demonstrated. The high step-ratio is accomplished by combination of inherent half-bridge ratio, SM stack modulation, and transformer turns ratio, which also offers flexibility to satisfy wide-range conversion requirements. The theoretical analysis of this converter is verified by simulation of a full-scale 40 MW, 200 kV converter with 146 SMs and also through experimental testing of a down-scaled prototype at 4.5 kW, 1.5 kV with 18 SMs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据