4.8 Article

A Highly Linear, AEC-Q100 Compliant Signal Conditioning IC for Automotive Piezo-Resistive Pressure Sensors

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 65, 期 9, 页码 7363-7373

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2798562

关键词

Analog-to-digital converter (ADC); digital-to-analog converter (DAC); digital automatic calibration piezo-resistive type pressure sensor; spread spectrum clock generator (SSCG); temperature compensation

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2017R1A2B3008718]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the design of a signal conditioning analog front-end (AFE) IC for an automotive piezo-resistive type pressure sensor is presented. To improve the pressure-sensing accuracy and compensate for variations in the pressure sensor and signal conditioning IC, gauge factor calibration, digital automatic offset, and gain calibration are proposed and implemented with low power consumption. By using a high-resolution analog-to-digital converter and digital-to-analog converter, the digital automatic calibration circuit can guarantee linearity of output voltage with respect to pressure to within 0.5%. As the analog signal is converted to a digital signal, accuracy in the AFE IC improves. To improve the reliability in the automotive environment, over-voltage and reverse-voltage protection circuits are integrated with the electrostatic discharge protection circuit. Also, electromagnetic interference is reduced by using the proposed spread spectrum clock generator. The proposed design is implemented using 2P4M 0.35 mu m CMOS technology with an active area of 1.94 mm x 1.94 mm. Full output ranges from 0.5 to 4.5 V. The ratiometricity error is within +/- 0.25% when the supply voltage is changed by +/- 10%. Current consumption is 4.7 mA from a 5 V supply. The output accuracy is within +/- 0.5% with respect to the PVT variations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据