4.8 Article

A Wiener-Process-Model-Based Method for Remaining Useful Life Prediction Considering Unit-to-Unit Variability

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 66, 期 3, 页码 2092-2101

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2838078

关键词

Particle filtering (PF); remaining useful life (RUL) prediction; unit maximum likelihood estimation (UMLE); unit-to-unit variability (UtUV); Wiener process model (WPM)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1709208, 61673311]
  2. Young Talent Support plan of Central Organization department

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction has attracted more and more attention in recent years because of its significance in predictive maintenance. The degradation processes of systems from the same population are generally different from one another due to their various operational conditions and health states. This behavior is defined as unit-to-unit variability (UtUV), which brings difficulty to RUL prediction. To handle this problem, this paper develops a Wiener-process-model (WPM)-based method for RUL prediction with the consideration of the UtUV. In this method, an age-and state-dependent WPM is specially designed to describe the various degradation processes of different units. A unit maximum likelihood estimation (UMLE) algorithm is proposed to estimate the UtUV parameter according to the measurements of training units, without any restriction to the distribution pattern of the parameter. The UtUV parameter is further updated via particle filtering (PF) according to the measurements of the testing unit. In the particle updating process, a fuzzy resampling algorithm is developed to handle the sample impoverishment problem of PF. With the updated parameter, the RUL is predicted through a degradation process simulation algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified through a simulation study and a turbofan engine degradation dataset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据