4.7 Article

A New Spatial-Spectral Feature Extraction Method for Hyperspectral Images Using Local Covariance Matrix Representation

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2801387

关键词

Covariance matrix representation (CMR); feature extraction (FE); hyperspectral image (HSI) classification; manifold space (MS)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China for Distinguished Young Scholars [61325007]
  2. National Natural Science Fund of China for International Cooperation and Exchanges [61520106001]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientist of China [61501180]
  4. Fund of Hunan Province for Science and Technology Plan Project [2017RS3024]
  5. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a novel local covariance matrix (CM) representation method is proposed to fully characterize the correlation among different spectral bands and the spatial-contextual information in the scene when conducting feature extraction (FE) from hyperspectral images (HSIs). Specifically, our method first projects the HSI into a subspace, using the maximum noise fraction method. Then, for each test pixel in the subspace, its most similar neighboring pixels (within a local spatial window) are clustered using the cosine distance measurement. The test pixel and its neighbors are used to calculate a local CM for FE purposes. Each nondiagonal entry in the matrix characterizes the correlation between different spectral bands. Finally, these matrices are used as spatial-spectral features and fed to a support vector machine for classification purposes. The proposed method offers a new strategy to characterize the spatial-spectral information in the HSI prior to classification. Experimental results have been conducted using three publicly available hyperspectral data sets for classification, indicating that the proposed method can outperform several state-of-the-art techniques, especially when the training samples available are limited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据