4.8 Article

Inherent Fuzzy Entropy for the Improvement of EEG Complexity Evaluation

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 1032-1035

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2666789

关键词

Complexity; electroencephalogram (EEG); empirical mode decomposition (EMD); entropy; fuzzy

资金

  1. Computational Intelligence and Brain Computer Interface (CI&BCI) Centre, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP150101645]
  3. Aiming for the Top University Plan of National Chiao Tung University, the Ministry of Education, Taiwan [104W963]
  4. Army Research Laboratory [W911NF-10-2-0022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, the concept of entropy has been widely used to measure the dynamic complexity of signals. Since the state of complexity of human beings is significantly affected by their health state, developing accurate complexity evaluation algorithms is a crucial and urgent area of study. This paper proposes using inherent fuzzy entropy (Inherent FuzzyEn) and its multiscale version, which employs empirical mode decomposition and fuzzy membership function (exponential function) to address the dynamic complexity in electroencephalogram (EEG) data. In the literature, the reliability of entropy-based complexity evaluations has been limited by superimposed trends in signals and a lack of multiple time scales. Our proposed method represents the first attempt to use the Inherent FuzzyEn algorithm to increase the reliability of complexity evaluation in realistic EEG applications. We recorded the EEG signals of several subjects under resting condition, and the EEG complexity was evaluated using approximate entropy, sample entropy, FuzzyEn, and Inherent FuzzyEn, respectively. The results indicate that Inherent FuzzyEn is superior to other competing models regardless of the use of fuzzy or nonfuzzy structures, and has the most stable complexity and smallest root mean square deviation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据