4.5 Article

Hybrid Fuzzy-Probabilistic Approach to Supply Chain Resilience Assessment

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
卷 65, 期 2, 页码 303-315

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2017.2773574

关键词

Flexibility and time-based management; fuzzy and grey systems; manufacturing supply chain (SC); network theory; supply chain integration; supply chain resilience

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [15-07-08391, 15-08-08459, 16-07-00779, 16-08-00510, 16-08-01277, 16-29-09482-Ofi-i, 17-08-00797, 17-06-00108, 17-01-00139, 17-20-01214, 17-29-07073-Ofi-i]
  2. ITMO University [074-U01]
  3. State Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [2.3135.2017/4.6]
  4. International project ERASMUS +
  5. Capacity Building in Higher Education [73751-EPP-1- 2016-1-DE-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP]
  6. Innovative Teaching and Learning Strategies in Open Modelling and Simulation Environment for Student-Centered Engineering Education
  7. Russian Science Foundation [17-11-01254]
  8. [0073-2014-0009]
  9. [0073-2015-0007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the existing models of supply chain resilience assessment are extended by incorporating ripple effect and structure reconfiguration. Ripple effect mitigation control is vital for supply chain risk management from positions of structural resilience and recoverability. The research approach is based on a hybrid fuzzy-probabilistic approach. The genome method is applied with the objective of including the structural properties of supply chain design into resilience assessment. A supply chain design resilience index is developed, and its computation and application are demonstrated. The results suggest a method of comparing different supply chain designs regarding the resilience both to disruption propagation and with recovery consideration. It also allows the identification of groups of critical suppliers whose failure interrupts supply chain operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据