4.7 Article

Cache-Enabled HetNets With Millimeter Wave Small Cells

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS
卷 66, 期 11, 页码 5497-5511

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2851593

关键词

Caching; heterogeneous networks; millimeter wave; stochastic geometry; user association

资金

  1. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/N029720/2]
  2. EPSRC [EP/N029720/1, EP/N029720/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we consider a novel cache-enabled heterogeneous network (HetNet), where macro base stations (BSs) with traditional sub-6 GHz are overlaid by dense millimeter wave (mmWave) pico BSs. These two-tier BSs, which are modeled as two independent homogeneous Poisson point processes, cache multimedia contents following the popularity rank. High-capacity backhauls are utilized between macro BSs and the core server. In contrast to the simplified flat-top antenna pattern analyzed in previous articles, we employ an actual antenna model with the uniform linear array at all mmWave BSs. To evaluate the performance of our system, we introduce two distinctive user association strategies: 1) maximum received power (Max-RP) scheme; and 2) maximum rate (Max-Rate) scheme. With the aid of these two schemes, we deduce new theoretical equations for success probabilities and area spectral efficiencies. Considering a special case with practical path loss laws, several closed-form expressions for coverage probabilities are derived to gain several insights. Monte Carlo simulations are presented to verify the analytical conclusions. We show that: 1) the proposed HetNet is an interference-limited system and it outperforms the traditional HetNets in terms of the success probability; 2) there exists an optimal pre-decided rate threshold that contributes to the maximum ASE; and 3) Max-Rate achieves higher success probability and ASE than Max-RP but it needs the extra information of the interference effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据