4.7 Article

Improving the Coverage and Spectral Efficiency of Millimeter-Wave Cellular Networks Using Device-to-Device Relays

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS
卷 66, 期 5, 页码 2251-2265

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.2017.2787990

关键词

Millimeter Wave; cellular; D2D; relay; coverage; spectral efficiency; stochastic geometry

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [ECCS-1509514, CNS-1718977, ECCS-1731672]
  2. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1802710] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The susceptibility of millimeter waveform propagation to blockages limits the coverage of millimeter-wave (mm Wave) signals. To overcome blockages, we propose to leverage two-hop device-to-device (D2D) relaying. Using stochastic geometry, we derive expressions for the downlink coverage probability of relay-assisted mm Wave cellular networks when the D2D links are implemented in either uplink mm Wave or uplink microwave bands. We further investigate the spectral efficiency (SE) improvement in the cellular downlink, and the effect of D2D transmissions on the cellular uplink. For mm Wave links, we derive the coverage probability using dominant interferer analysis while accounting for both blockages and beamforming gains. For microwave D2D links, we derive the coverage probability considering both line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) propagation. Numerical results show that downlink coverage and SE can be improved using two-hop D2D relaying. Specifically, microwave D2D relays achieve better coverage because D2D connections can be established under NLOS conditions. However, mm Wave D2D relays achieve better coverage when the density of interferers is large because blockages eliminate interference from NLOS interferers. The SE on the downlink depends on the relay mode selection strategy, and mm Wave D2D relays use a significantly smaller fraction of uplink resources than microwave D2D relays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据