4.6 Article

Detecting Vascular Age Using the Analysis of Peripheral Pulse

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 65, 期 12, 页码 2742-2750

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2814630

关键词

Laser doppler flowmetry; vascular ageing; microcirculation; pulse decomposition analysis; support vector machine

资金

  1. Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze, Florence, Italy [2015.0914]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular ageing is known to be accompanied by arterial stiffening and vascular endothelial dysfunction, and represents an independent factor contributing to the development of cardiovascular disease. The microvascular pulse is affected by the biomechanical alterations of the circulatory system, and has been the focus of studies aiming at the development of non-invasive methods able to extract physiologically relevant features. Objective: proposing an approach for the assessment of vascular ageing based on a support vector machine (SVM) learning from features of the pulse contour. Methods: the supervised classifier was trained and validated over 20935 models of pulse wave, obtained with a multi-Gaussian decomposition algorithm, applied to laser Doppler flowmetry signals of 54 healthy, non-smoker subjects. Results: the multi-Gaussian model showed a mean R-2 of 0.98 and an average normalized root mean square error of 0.90, demonstrating the ability to reconstruct the pulse shape. Over 30 training and validation experiments, the SVM showed a mean Pearson's r of 0.808 between the rate of waves classified as old and the age of the subjects, along with an average area under the ROC curve of 0.953. Conclusion: the SVM showed the capability to discriminate differently aged individuals. Significance: the proposed method might detect the ageing-related modifications of the vascular tree; furthermore, since diabetes promotes vascular alterations comparable to ageing, this approach may be also suitable for the screening of diabetic angiopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据