4.5 Article

Postoperative delirium and pre-fracture disability predict 6-month mortality among the oldest old hip fracture patients

期刊

AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 53-60

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40520-014-0242-y

关键词

Oldest old; Hip fracture; Surgery; Delirium; Pre-fracture disability; Mortality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Age is one of the most robust risk factors for hip fracture. Recent projections indicate that almost half of hip fractures are occurring with an increasing trend among the oldest old (i.e., in those aged[85 years). Aims To compare clinical characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors for 6-month mortality in two groups of oldest old patients (group 1 = 85-89, group 2 > 90 years), after hip fracture surgery. Methods Observational prospective cohort study with 6-month follow-up, performed in an Orthogeriatric Unit of an academic hospital between March 2007 and November 2012. Results Two hundred seventy-five patients (group 1: N = 171; group 2: N = 104) underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment, including demographics, clinical, functional, nutritional, and mental status. The 6-month rehospitalization and mortality rates after surgery were assessed through structured telephone interviews with patient's caregivers. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate predictors of 6-month mortality, adjusting for relevant covariates. Fifty-eight patients died at follow-up. The in-hospital and 6-month mortality rates were significantly higher for patients of group 2 than for those of group 1. After adjusting for covariates, the multivariate logistic regressions showed that severe disability (OR 2.24, 95 % CI 1.08-4.65) and postoperative delirium (POD) (OR 3.80, 95 % CI 1.72-8.39) were predictors of 6-month mortality. Conclusions Patients aged >90 years who underwent hip fracture surgery are more likely to die at 6 months than those aged 85-89 years. Pre-fracture disability and POD are predictors of this excess of mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据