4.5 Review

Role of liver progenitors in liver regeneration

期刊

HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 48-+

出版社

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.01.16

关键词

Liver progenitor cells (LPCs); stem cells; mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs); hepatic stellate cells (HSCs); liver regeneration; liver failure; liver cirrhosis

资金

  1. Polkemmet Trust
  2. CORE
  3. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (Interuniversity Attraction Poles program) [P6/20, P7/83-HEPRO]
  4. Brussels Capital Region (INNOVIRIS Impulseprogramme)
  5. German Research Foundation [DFG CA267/11-1, CA267/13-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During massive liver injury and hepatocyte loss, the intrinsic regenerative capacity of the liver by replication of resident hepatocytes is overwhelmed. Treatment of this condition depends on the cause of liver injury, though in many cases liver transplantation (LT) remains the only curative option. LT for end stage chronic and acute liver diseases is hampered by shortage of donor organs and requires immunosuppression. Hepatocyte transplantation is limited by yet unresolved technical difficulties. Since currently no treatment is available to facilitate liver regeneration directly, therapies involving the use of resident liver stem or progenitor cells (LPCs) or non-liver stem cells are coming to fore. LPCs are quiescent in the healthy liver, but may be activated under conditions where the regenerative capacity of mature hepatocytes is severely impaired. Non-liver stem cells include embryonic stem cells (ES cells) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). In the first section, we aim to provide an overview of the role of putative cytokines, growth factors, mitogens and hormones in regulating LPC response and briefly discuss the prognostic value of the LPC response in clinical practice. In the latter section, we will highlight the role of other (non-liver) stem cells in transplantation and discuss advantages and disadvantages of ES cells, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS), as well as MSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据