3.8 Review

Dementia and the population health approach: promise, pitfalls and progress. An Australian perspective

期刊

REVIEWS IN CLINICAL GERONTOLOGY
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 60-71

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0959259814000203

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; dementia; health policy; health promotion; public health; prevention

资金

  1. Dementia Collaborative Research Centre - Prevention, Early Intervention
  2. Risk Reduction (DCRC2) at the Australian National University in Canberra

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing prevalence of dementia in Australia (and worldwide) over the next few decades poses enormous social, health and economic challenges. In the absence of a cure, strategies to prevent, delay the onset of, or reduce the impact of dementia are required to contain a growing disease burden, and health and care costs. A population health approach has the potential to substantially reduce the impact of dementia. Internationally, many countries have started to adopt population health strategies that incorporate elements of dementia prevention. The authors examine some of the elements of such an approach and barriers to its implementation. International dementia frameworks and strategies were reviewed to identify options utilized for a population health approach to dementia. Internationally and nationally, dementia frameworks are being developed that include population health approaches. Most of the frameworks identified included early diagnosis and intervention, and increasing community awareness as key objectives, while several included promotion of the links between a healthy lifestyle and reduced risk for dementia. A poor evidence base (especially for illness prevention), diagnostic and technical limitations, and policy and implementation issues are significant barriers in maximizing the promise of population health approaches in this area. The review and analysis of the population health approach to dementia will inform national and jurisdictional policy development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据