4.5 Article

A coherent approach for analysis of the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip improves data quality and performance in epigenome-wide association studies

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0600-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
  2. British Heart Foundation [SP/04/002]
  3. Medical Research Council [G0601966, G0700931]
  4. Wellcome Trust [084723/Z/08/Z]
  5. NIHR [RP-PG-0407-10371]
  6. European Union FP7 (EpiMigrant) [279143]
  7. Action on Hearing Loss [G51]
  8. Wellcome Trust grant [090532/Z/09/Z]
  9. MRC Hub [G0900747 91070]
  10. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College
  11. NIHR Health Protection Research Unit on Health Impact of Environmental Hazards
  12. MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health
  13. Wellcome Trust [084723/Z/08/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  14. MRC [G0601966, G0700931, MR/L01341X/1, MR/K002414/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. Medical Research Council [G0601966, MR/L01341X/1, G0700931, G0801056B] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10136] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA methylation plays a fundamental role in the regulation of the genome, but the optimal strategy for analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation data remains to be determined. We developed a comprehensive analysis pipeline for epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip, based on 2,687 individuals, with 36 samples measured in duplicate. We propose new approaches to quality control, data normalisation and batch correction through control-probe adjustment and establish a null hypothesis for EWAS using permutation testing. Our analysis pipeline outperforms existing approaches, enabling accurate identification of methylation quantitative trait loci for hypothesis driven follow-up experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据