4.7 Article

Energy-Aware Sensing in Data-Intensive Field Systems Using Supercapacitor Energy Buffer

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 3372-3383

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2809683

关键词

Solar energy harvesting; supercapacitors; cyber physical systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy sustainability is important for field data sensing and processing in intelligent transportation, environmental monitoring, and context awareness. Rechargeable batteries in self-sustainable systems suffer from adverse environmental impact, low thermal stability, and fast aging. Advancements in supercapacitor energy density and low-power processors have reached an inflection point, where a data-intensive (e.g., operating on high-frame-rate visual data) field-deployed system can rely solely on supercapacitors for energy buffering. This paper demonstrates the first working prototype of such a system, consisting of eight 3000-Farad supercapacitors, a 70-mW controller/harvester board, and a Nexus tablet. We address the challenges of maintaining quality-of-service (QoS) on a limited energy buffer. We leverage the voltage-to-stored-energy relationship in capacitors to enable precise energy buffer modeling (no more than 3% error in time-to-depletion prediction). To achieve high precision, we find that it is necessary to account for the variation of effective capacitance, particularly lower capacitance at lower voltages nearing energy depletion. Modern mobile processors operate most efficiently at very high load (when most cycles are effectively utilized) or very low load (when fewer cores are active at a lower frequency). We propose delayed bursts-continuous low-power data capture and bursts of data processing at a higher CPU configuration-to improve the power proportionality and realize high QoS at varying energy budget. Our working prototype has been successfully deployed at a campus building rooftop where it analyzes nearby traffic patterns continuously.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据