4.6 Article

Implications of late-in-life density-dependent growth for fishery size-at-entry leading to maximum sustainable yield

期刊

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 75, 期 4, 页码 1296-1305

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsx236

关键词

density dependence; maximum sustainable yield; selective fishing; size spectrum

资金

  1. Centre for Ocean Life
  2. VKR Centre of Excellence by the Villum Foundation
  3. European Union [675997]
  4. Villum Fonden [00007178] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently applied fisheries models and stock assessments rely on the assumption that density-dependent regulation only affects processes early in life, as described by stock-recruitment relationships. However, many fish stocks also experience density-dependent processes late in life, such as density-dependent adult growth. Theoretical studies have found that, for stocks which experience strong late-in-life density dependence, maximum sustainable yield (MSY) is obtained with a small fishery size-at-entry that also targets juveniles. This goes against common fisheries advice, which dictates that primarily adults should be fished. This study aims to examine whether the strength of density-dependent growth in actual fish stocks is sufficiently strong to reduce optimal fishery size-at-entry to below size-at-maturity. A size-structured model is fitted to three stocks that have shown indications of late-in-life density-dependent growth: North Sea plaice (Pleuronectes platessa), Northeast Atlantic (NEA) mackerel (Scomber scombrus), and Baltic sprat (Sprattus sprattus balticus). For all stocks, the model predicts exploitation at MSY with a large size-at-entry into the fishery, indicating that late-in-life density dependence in fish stocks is generally not strong enough to warrant the targeting of juveniles. This result lends credibility to the practise of predominantly targeting adults in spite of the presence of late-in-life density-dependent growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据