3.8 Article

Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose/hyaluronic acid composites

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1740349914529094

关键词

Bacterial cellulose; hyaluronic acid; composite; characterization; 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21106105]
  2. Chinese National Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates [201310057055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial cellulose/hyaluronic acid composites have been prepared by the nontoxic cross-linking agent 1-ethyl-3( 3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide. The effects of hyaluronic acid concentration, temperature, and the 1-ethyl-3( 3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide addition way on the performance of the composites have been discussed. Field emission scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and thermogravimetric analyzer have been used to characterize the composite materials. The hyaluronic acid contents in the composites have been assayed by a colorimetric method. Hyaluronic acid concentration, the 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide addition way, and temperature have impacts on the hyaluronic acid content in composites. Fourier transform infrared spectra confirm the amide groups on the composites, which is attributed to hyaluronic acid molecules. The crystallinity indexes of composites decrease, in comparison with pristine bacterial cellulose, known from X-ray diffraction tests, possibly due to the integration of hyaluronic acid. The thermal decomposition temperatures of Composites A and B from Process 1 are lower than those of bacterial cellulose, which is ascribed to lower pyrolysis temperatures of hyaluronic acid compound in composite materials. However, Composites C and D from Process 2 do not undergo descent thermal stability. The novel nanocomposites have the potential to be used for biomedical and tissue engineering scaffold materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据