4.7 Article

Extraction of vanadium from direct acid leaching solution of clay vanadium ore using solvent extraction with N235

期刊

HYDROMETALLURGY
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 27-33

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.02.004

关键词

Solvent extraction; Vanadium; Tertiary amine N235; Direct acid leaching solution; Solution chemistry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51304090, 51604130]
  2. Key Project of Applied Basic Research Programs of Yunnan Province, China [2014FA027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solvent extraction of vanadium from a direct acid leaching solution, generated by the direct leaching of clay vanadium ore, was conducted using tertiary amine N235, and the effects of the main factors on the extraction of vanadium and iron were investigated. Through a three-stage countercurrent extraction under the following optimum conditions: N235 concentration of 10% (v/v), initial aqueous phase pH of 1.8 similar to 2.0, phase ratio (A/O) of 2.5, and extraction time of 5 min, vanadium extraction efficiency reached above 98% whereas iron and other impurities were barely extracted. In addition, the solution chemical behavior of the vanadium extraction with N235 was analyzed. After oxidation and neutralization, V(N) was oxidized to V(V), and VO2+ was converted to various forms of anions. N235, acidified by H2SO4 to convert R3N to (R3NH)(2)SO4, was able to extract vanadium through anion-exchange reaction. When vanadium was in the specific form of [H2V10O28](4-), high extraction efficiency was obtained, and vanadium was extracted more easily. As the pH increased, the concentration of [H2V10O28](4-) and the dissociation of HSO4- also increased, which improved extraction efficiency. Vanadium existed in form of [H2V10O28](4-) within a wide pH range of 1-3.5, but dissociation of (R3NH)(2)SO4 occurred at pH > 2.0, which hampered the extraction. Moreover, Fe(III) was precipitated by hydrolysis at pH > 2.0, which prevented the two phases from separating and caused a coprecipitation loss of vanadium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据