4.4 Article

Global quality assessment of liver allograft C4d staining during acute antibody-mediated rejection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 144-155

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.12.007

关键词

Complement fragment 4d; Liver allograft; Antibody-mediated rejection; Method; Tissue microarray

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Discussion of liver antibody-mediated rejection during the 2011, 2013, and 2015 Banff liver sessions raised concerns over reliability of complement fragment 4d (C4d) staining, precipitating a global survey followed by a tissue microarray staining quality assessment study among centers on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Tissue microarray sections containing tissue plugs of resected native and allograft (with acute antibody-mediated rejection) liver, heart, and kidney (n = 33 total cores) were sent to 31 centers for C4d staining using local method(s) and pathologist scoring. Digital whole-slide images (n = 40) were then semiquantitatively scored by 7 experts for background, distribution, and intensity of portal vein and capillary, hepatic artery, sinusoidal, and central vein endothelia and portal and central stromal staining. Results showed that strong and diffuse portal vein and capillary C4d staining, as determined by both local and central pathologists, clearly distinguished allografts showing acute antibody-mediated rejection from native livers and from those with evidence of weaker donor-specific antibody. Downstream vascular endothelial cell C4d staining and assessment were more variable and difficult to identify. C4d staining in the majority of laboratories reliably detects acute liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection in formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues. Assessment should focus on portal veins and capillaries, sinusoids, and central veins present in peripheral core needle biopsies. C4d staining in one organ does not always translate to staining in another. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据