4.4 Article

H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline gliomas in different anatomical locations

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 89-96

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.04.015

关键词

H3 K27M; Glioma; IDH; Overall survival; ATRX

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81401040]
  2. Beijing Excellent Talent Training Project Grant [201600026833ZK07]
  3. Capital Health Research and Development of Special Funds [2016-1-2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The histone H3 K27M mutation has been frequently reported in most diffuse midline gliomas. However, the relationship between the H3 K27M mutation and clinical outcomes of gliomas from different anatomical locations is still not fully understood. A total of 120 patients with diffuse midline gliomas were selected for this retrospective observational study. The status of H3 K27M, ATRX, TP53, and IDH was evaluated using immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing. Of the 120 patients aged from 4 to 76 years (median, 27 years), 61 (50.8%) were harboring the H3 K27M mutation. Tumors were mainly located in the brainstem, ATRX thalamus, and spinal cord, but also in the cerebellum, corpus callosum, and the lateral ventricle. Patients with H3 K27M mutant diffuse midline gliomas had a significantly shorter overall survival than H3 wild-type counterparts (P=.001). However, the H3 K27M mutation was mainly associated with a poorer prognosis in infratentorial gliomas compared with the corresponding H3 wild-type gliomas (P<.0001), but not in supratentorial gliomas (P=.603). Moreover, patients with H3 K27M mutant gliomas in unusual anatomical locations had a better prognosis than did those with corresponding tumors in the brainstem. This study may provide guidance for better treatment stratification decisions for diffuse gliomas bearing the H3 K27M mutation, which arise in different locations of the brainstem, thalamus, spinal cord, or other sites. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据