4.4 Article

Lymphocytic colitis: pathologic predictors of response to therapy

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 1-7

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.02.007

关键词

Lymphocytic colitis; Histology; Therapy; Response; Collagen table; Eosinophil clusters

资金

  1. Abbive
  2. Samsung Bioepis
  3. Takeda
  4. Takeda Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the presence of intraepithelial lymphocytosis with surface epithelial damage is a unifying feature of lymphocytic colitis, there are nonclassical features that create morphologic heterogeneity between cases. Limited data on the significance of these secondary histologic features are available. Cases of lymphocytic colitis diagnosed between 2002 and 2013 were identified using the Research Patient Data Registry of a tertiary referral center. Diagnostic biopsy slides were reviewed and evaluated for histologic features of lymphocytic colitis. Clinical data including type of therapy and response to treatment were collected. chi(2) Test (or Fisher exact test) and logistic regression analysis were used where appropriate. Thirty-two cases of lymphocytic colitis with complete clinical data and slides available for review were identified. The mean age was 56.4 years, and the female-to-male ratio was 3:2. Eleven patients improved with minimal intervention (group 1), 14 patients responded to steroid therapy (group 2), and 7 patients responded to mesalamine, bismuth subsalicylate, and/or cholestyramine therapy (group 3). Histologic differences in the characteristics of the subepithelial collagen table (P=.018), the severity of lamina propria inflammation (P=.042), and the presence of eosinophil clusters (P=.016) were seen between groups 2 and 3. Patients in group 1 were more likely to have mild crypt architectural distortion in their biopsies than patients in groups 2 and 3. Lymphocytic colitis is a heterogeneous disease, and the evaluation of histologic factors may help identify various subtypes and predict therapy response. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据