4.5 Article

MYO5B, STX3, and STXBP2 mutations reveal a common disease mechanism that unifies a subset of congenital diarrheal disorders: A mutation update

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 333-344

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23386

关键词

congenital diarrheal diseases; enteropathy; microvillus inclusion disease; munc18-2; MYO5B; myosin VB; STX3; STXBP2; syntaxin-3

资金

  1. Daniel Courtney Trust Foundation
  2. University Medical Center Groningen
  3. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique [ANR-13-BSV8-0019-01]
  4. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer [SFI20121205398]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-BSV8-0019] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microvillus inclusion disease (MVID) is a rare but fatal autosomal recessive congenital diarrheal disorder caused by MYO5B mutations. In 2013, we launched an open-access registry for MVID patients and their MYO5B mutations (www.mvid-central.org). Since then, additional unique MYO5B mutations have been identified in MVID patients, but also in non-MVID patients. Animal models have been generated that formally prove the causality between MYO5B and MVID. Importantly, mutations in two other genes, STXBP2 and STX3, have since been associated with variants of MVID, shedding new light on the pathogenesis of this congenital diarrheal disorder. Here, we review these additional genes and their mutations. Furthermore, we discuss recent data from cell studies that indicate that the three genes are functionally linked and, therefore, may constitute a common disease mechanism that unifies a subset of phenotypically linked congenital diarrheal disorders. We present new data based on patient material to support this. To congregate existing and future information on MVID geno-/phenotypes, we have updated and expanded the MVID registry to include all currently known MVID-associated gene mutations, their demonstrated or predicted functional consequences, and associated clinical information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据