4.2 Article

Place and culture-based professional development: cross-hybrid learning and the construction of ecological mindfulness

期刊

CULTURAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE EDUCATION
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 121-134

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-014-9585-0

关键词

Ecological mindfulness; Hawaiian newspapers; Place-based professional development; Indigenous maps; Cross-cultural hybridity

资金

  1. US Department of Education under the Native Hawaiian Education Act and National Science Foundation, Opportunities for Enhancing Diversity in the Geosciences (OEDG) Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper approaches mindfulness, an awareness of internal and external realities, as a culturally-shaped habit of mind. Findings of a cross-cultural study and popular sayings that reflect America's cultural orientation to consumption and competition are contrasted with findings from Hawaiian language newspapers, traditional cultural practices, and Hawaiian sayings that indicate an orientation to ecological mindfulness that increased the resilience of fragile social ecosystems. Marginalization of indigenous culture, language, and knowledge and cultural differences between teachers and indigenous students are proposed as a contributing factor to lower science performance of Native Hawaiian students in mainstream schools. Two professional development projects designed to reduce conflicts between culture and science instruction are presented. Findings from these projects suggest alignment of science inquiry with indigenous cultural knowledge and practices oriented to sustainability supports the development of teachers' ecological mindfulness as indicated by increased awareness of, interest in, and incorporation of place and culture-based based resources into their instruction. Teacher feedback indicates that mapping technologies that enable teachers to visualize and integrate indigenous place- based Hawaiian knowledge with science inquiry are promising instructional strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据