4.4 Article

Histone deacetylase 1 expression is inversely correlated with age in the short-lived fish Nothobranchius furzeri

期刊

HISTOCHEMISTRY AND CELL BIOLOGY
卷 150, 期 3, 页码 255-269

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00418-018-1687-4

关键词

Histone deacetylase; Nothobranchius furzeri; Epigenetics; Aging

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P25807, P30642]
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P25807, P30642] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aging is associated with profound changes in the epigenome, resulting in alterations of gene expression, epigenetic landscape, and genome architecture. Class I Histone deacetylases (HDACs), consisting of HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, and HDAC8, play a major role in epigenetic regulation of chromatin structure and transcriptional control, and have been implicated as key players in the pathogenesis of age-dependent diseases and disorders affecting health and longevity. Here, we report the identification of class I Hdac orthologs and their detailed spatio-temporal expression profile in the short-lived fish Nothobranchius furzeri from the onset of embryogenesis until old age covering the entire lifespan of the organism. Database search of the recently annotated N. furzeri genomes retrieved four distinct genes: two copies of hdac1 and one copy of each hdac3 and hdac8. However, no hdac2 ortholog could be identified. Phylogenetic analysis grouped the individual killifish class I Hdacs within the well-defined terminal clades. We find that upon aging, Hdac1 is significantly down-regulated in muscle, liver, and brain, and this age-dependent down-regulation in brain clearly correlates with increased mRNA levels of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor cdkn1a (p21). Furthermore, this apparent reduction of class I HDACs in transcript and protein levels is mirrored in the mouse brain, highlighting an evolutionarily conserved role of class I HDACs during normal development and in the aging process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据