4.1 Article

Treatment options in myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy Focus on i.v. immunoglobulins

期刊

HERZ
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 423-430

出版社

URBAN & VOGEL
DOI: 10.1007/s00059-018-4719-x

关键词

Carditis; Inflammation; Cardiomyopathies; Treatment; Intravenous immunoglobulins

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Wissenschaft und Forschung (BMBF) in the German Competence Net of Heart Failure (KNHI)
  2. Prof. Dr. Reinfried Pohl Stiftung
  3. Verein zur Forderung der Kardiologie (VFDK) Marburg
  4. UKGM Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy, an etiologically driven treatment is today the best option beyond heart failure therapy. Prerequisites for this are noninvasive and invasive biomarkers including endomyocardial biopsy and polymerase chain reaction on cardiotropic agents. Imaging by Doppler echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as well as cardiac biomarkers such as C-reactive protein, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and troponins can contribute to the clinical work-up of the syndrome but not toward elucidating the underlying cause or pathogenetic process. This review summarizes the phases and clinical features of myocarditis and gives an up-to-date short overview of the current treatment options starting with heart failure and antiarrhythmic therapy. Although inflammation in myocardial disease can resolve spontaneously, often specific treatment directed against the causative agent is required. For fulminant, acute, and chronic autoreactive myocarditis, immunosuppressive treatment has proven to be beneficial in the TIMIC and ESETCID trials; for viral cardiomyopathy and myocarditis, intravenous immunoglobulin IgG subtype and polyvalent intravenous immunoglobulins IgG, IgA, and IgM can frequently resolve inflammation. However, despite the elimination of inflammation, the eradication of parvovirus B19 and human herpesvirus-6 is still a challenge, for which ivlg treatment can become a future key player.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据