4.5 Article

Maternal, dominance and additive genetic effects in Nile tilapia; influence on growth, fillet yield and body size traits

期刊

HEREDITY
卷 120, 期 5, 页码 452-462

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41437-017-0046-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/D/20211554, BBS/E/D/30002275] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. BBSRC [BBS/E/D/20211554] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/D/20211554] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are only few studies of dominance effects in non-inbred aquaculture species, since commonly used mating designs often have low power to separate dominance, maternal and common environmental effects. Here, a factorial design with reciprocal cross, common rearing of eggs and subsequent lifecycle stages and pedigree assignment using DNA microsatellites was used to separate these effects and estimate dominance (d(2)) and maternal (m(2)) ratios in Nile tilapia for six commercial traits. The study included observations on 2524 offspring from 155 full-sib families. Substantial contributions of dominance were observed (P < 0.05) for body depth (BD) and body weight at harvest (BWH) with estimates of d(2) = 0.27 (s.e. 0.09) and 0.23 (s.e. 0.09), respectively in the current breeding population. In addition the study found maternal variance (P < 0.05) for BD, BWH, body thickness and fillet weight explaining similar to 10% of the observed phenotypic variance. For fillet yield (FY) and body length (BL), no evidence was found for either maternal or dominance variance. For traits exhibiting maternal variance, including this effect in evaluations caused substantial re-ranking of selection candidates, but the impact of including dominance effects was notably less. Breeding schemes may benefit from utilising maternal variance in increasing accuracy of evaluations, reducing bias, and developing new lines, but the utilisation of the dominance variance may require further refinement of parameter estimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据