4.0 Article

Long-Term Influence of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Liver Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in a Rat Model

期刊

ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 132-140

出版社

INT SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION, INC
DOI: 10.12659/AOT.892364

关键词

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells; Reperfusion Injury; Tissue Engineering

资金

  1. Nicolaus Copernicus University [112, 266]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term usefulness of intraportal injection of the bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) in limitation of experimentally induced ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in a rat model. Material/Methods: Twenty Wistar rats were divided into 3 groups: donor group (n=5), study group (n=10), and control group (n=5). IRI was performed using a modified hanging-weight system after left portal triad occlusion in study group animals. Isolated autologous BM-MSCs were labeled with fluorochrome PKH-26 then intraportally injected into the rats in the study group. Control group animals were intraportally injected with 1 ml of PBS. Follow-up was 3 months, after which animals were sacrificed for histopathological examination. Migration of BM-MSCs into different organs was examined. Results: H&E staining of liver tissue sections from time zero biopsies did not show many irregularities in structural or histological construction compared to liver sections from the control group. However, a small amount of centrilobular hepatocyte necrosis and coagulative necrosis with neutrophil infiltration areas was observed in liver sections of the study group. The migration assay of BM-MSCs labeled with PKH-26 showed the highest positive BM-MSCs staining (6%) in the spleen, while few positively stained cells were found (2%) in liver sections. No BM-MSCs were detected in brain, kidney, or lung tissues. Conclusions: These results suggest that intraportal bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell injection is safe and cells do not migrate chaotically to other organs after targeted implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据