4.3 Article

Higher body mass index may be a predictor of extrathyroidal extension in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

期刊

ENDOCRINE
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 264-271

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-014-0293-z

关键词

Body mass index (BMI); Obesity; Thyroid cancer; Thyroid malignancy; Extrathyroidal extension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, higher body mass index (BMI) has been associated with aggressive pathologic features of papillary thyroid carcinoma. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between BMI and aggressive pathologic features of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) and to evaluate whether the BMI can be a prognostic factor of PTMC. This retrospective study included 612 PTMC patients who underwent surgical excision at a referral center between April 2006 and December 2007. Patients were grouped according to BMI (< 25 or a parts per thousand yen25 kg/m(2)). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of aggressive pathologic features (advanced stage, extrathyroidal extension, and lymph node metastasis), with adjustment for age, gender, tumor size, multifocality, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level, and BMI (value/group). PTMC patients with a BMI a parts per thousand yen 25 kg/m(2) showed significantly higher prevalences of extrathyroidal extension, advanced pathologic TNM stage, and male gender, compared to those of patients with a BMI < 25 kg/m(2). Lymph node metastasis and mean TSH level were not significantly different between the two BMI subgroups. In multivariable analysis, the BMI a parts per thousand yen 25 kg/m(2) group was positively associated with the presence of extrathyroidal extension (adjusted odds ratio 1.49, P = 0.05). Higher BMI was associated with extrathyroidal extension in PTMC patients. This study suggests that the BMI could be considered as a prognostic factor for predicting the presence of extrathyroidal extension and it may help decide the appropriate surgical extent for PTMC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据