4.3 Article

Eight Days of Nightmares ... - Octogenarian Patients' Experiences of Postoperative Delirium after Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

期刊

HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 260-266

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.02.012

关键词

Delirium; Older patients; TAVI; Qualitative method

资金

  1. Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are increasingly performed in octogenarian patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), including those with high surgical risk. Postoperative delirium (PD) is a common and serious complication in older patients, characterised by reduced awareness, change in consciousness, disturbance in logical thinking and hallucinations. Methods To explore how octogenarian patients experienced PD, a qualitative study was conducted including five women and five men between 81 and 88 years. The incidence of PD was assessed for five days using the Confusion Assessment Method. Cognitive function was assessed preoperatively and at a 6-month follow-up using the Mini-Mental State Examination. In-depth interviews were conducted 6-12 months postdischarge, transcribed, and analysed using Giorgi's phenomenological method. Results Postoperative delirium experiences were grouped into six themes: Like dreaming while awake, Disturbed experiences of time, Existing in a twilight zone, Trapped in medical tubes, Moving between different surroundings and Meeting with death and the deceased. Conclusions For the first time, we show that octogenarian patients who undergo SAVR or TAVI have strong and distressing memories of their delirious state that can persist for up to 12 months later. These findings provide valuable new information that will likely improve delivery of health services and enhance professional and empathic care of octogenarians after SAVR and TAVI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据