4.5 Article

Danegaptide for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction patients: a phase 2 randomised clinical trial

期刊

HEART
卷 104, 期 19, 页码 1593-1599

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312774

关键词

cardiac magnetic resonance (cmr) imaging; percutaneous coronary intervention; acute myocardial infarction

资金

  1. Zealand Pharma A/S, Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Reperfusion immediately after reopening of the infarct-related artery in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may cause myocardial damage in addition to the ischaemic insult (reperfusion injury). The gap junction modulating peptide danegaptide has in animal models reduced this injury. We evaluated the effect of danegaptide on myocardial salvage in patients with STEMI. Methods In addition to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI patients with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow 0-1, single vessel disease and ischaemia time less than 6hours, we tested, in a clinical proof-of-concept study, the therapeutic potential of danegaptide at two-dose levels. Primary outcome was myocardial salvage evaluated by cardiac MRI after 3 months. Results From November 2013 to August 2015, a total of 585 patients were randomly enrolled in the trial. Imaging criteria were fulfilled for 79 (high dose), 80 (low dose) and 84 (placebo) patients eligible for the per-protocol analysis. Danegaptide did not affect the myocardial salvage index (danegaptide high (63.914.9), danegaptide low (65.615.6) and control (66.7 +/- 11.7), P=0.40), final infarct size (danegaptide high (19.6 +/- 11.4g), danegaptide low (18.6 +/- 9.6g) and control (21.4 +/- 15.0g), P=0.88) or left ventricular ejection fraction (danegaptide high (53.9%+/- 9.5%), danegaptide low (52.7%+/- 10.3%) and control (52.1%+/- 10.9%), P=0.64). There was no difference between groups with regard to clinical outcome. Conclusions Administration of danegaptide to patients with STEMI did not improve myocardial salvage. Trial registration number NCT01977755; Pre-results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据