4.8 Article

Organocatalysed depolymerisation of PET in a fully sustainable cycle using thermally stable protic ionic salt

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 1205-1212

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7gc03396f

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU [SUSPOL-EJD 642671]
  2. Gobierno Vasco/Eusko Jaurlaritza [IT 999-16]
  3. MINECO through project SUSPOL
  4. FDI [16507]
  5. European funding (ERDF)
  6. European funding (ESF)
  7. Conacyt (Mexico)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The world's plastic production is continuously and exponentially increasing, creating millions of tons of short-lived items that end as waste and accumulate in the environment. Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) provides one of the best examples as it is a non-biodegradable polymer that is mainly used as raw material for a wide range of packaging applications, making degradation of PET a subject of great interest for researchers. Herein we report a sustainable process for the chemical recycling of PET from waste to a new polymer using an innovative protic ionic salt. Using a simple solvent-free process, post-consumer PET bottles are degraded into bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET) monomer. The catalyst, formed by an equimolar quantity of triazabicyclodecene (TBD) and methanesulfonic acid (MSA), completely depolymerises PET in less than 2 h, producing 91% of highly pure BHET. Due to the unusual thermal stability of the TBD:MSA salt, the catalyst can be recycled at least 5 times to depolymerise more PET waste. In addition, we demonstrate that the monomer obtained from the degradation reaction can be used to synthesise new PET with similar thermal properties to that produced using a conventional polycondensation method. The protic ionic salt catalyst combines the excellent catalytic ability of organocatalysts with the thermal stability of metal catalysts, resisting degradation up to >400 degrees C, thus for the first time presenting an industrially-relevant organocatalyst for high-temperature polymer degradation and recycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据