4.4 Article

Anticholinergic burden and 1-year mortality among older patients discharged from acute care hospital

期刊

GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 705-713

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13234

关键词

anticholinergic burden; cognitive impairment; drugs; falls; mortality

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [GR-2007-685638]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimThe association between anticholinergic burden and mortality is controversial. We aimed to investigate whether the anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) score predicts 1-year mortality in older patients discharged from acute care hospitals. MethodsOur series consisted of 807 hospitalized patients aged 65years. Patients were followed up for 12months after discharge. All-cause mortality was the outcome of the study. The ACB score at discharge (0, 1, 2) and increasing ACB score from admission to discharge (no increase, +1, +2 or more) were calculated and used as exposure variables. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for potential confounders were used for the analysis. Interactions between the ACB score and cognitive impairment or history of falls were also investigated. ResultsDuring the follow-up period, 177 out of 807 participants (21.9%) died. After adjusting for potential confounders, a discharge ACB score of 2 (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.09-2.65) was significantly associated with the outcome, whereas the association between increasing ACB score of +2 or more and mortality was weaker (HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.95-1.92). The interaction between the ACB score at discharge or increasing ACB score and cognitive impairment was statistically significant (P =0.003 and P =0.004, respectively), whereas that between the ACB score and falls was not. ConclusionsThe ACB score at discharge and, to a lesser extent, an increasing ACB score during hospital stay are associated with an increased risk of 1-year mortality in older patients discharged from hospital. Such an association is stronger among patients with cognitive impairment. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 705-713

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据