4.6 Article

Dynamic equilibrium behaviour observed on two contrasting tidal flats from daily monitoring of bed-level changes

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 311, 期 -, 页码 114-126

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.025

关键词

Dynamic equilibrium theory; Tidal flats; Bed shear stress; EOF analysis

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0402601]
  2. NSFC [51761135022]
  3. NWO [ALWSD.2016.026, 850.13.011]
  4. EPSRC [EP/ R024537/1]
  5. NSFC grant [51609269]
  6. Guangdong Oceanic and Fishery Department scientific research and technological development program
  7. STW-NWO [07324]
  8. EU [607131]
  9. Galgeschoor project [002728]
  10. EPSRC [EP/R024537/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dynamic equilibrium theory (DET) has been applied to tidal flats to systematically explain intertidal morphological responses to various distributions of bed shear stress (BSS). However, it is difficult to verify this theory with field observations because of the discrepancy between the idealized conceptions of theory and the complex reality of intertidal dynamics. The core relation between intertidal morphodynamics and BSS distribution can be easily masked by noise in complex datasets, leading to conclusions of insufficient field evidence to support DET. In the current study, hydrodynamic and morphodynamic data were monitored daily for one year on two tidal flats with contrasting wave exposures. BSS distribution was obtained by validated numerical models. Tidal flat dynamic equilibrium behaviour and BSS were linked via Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis. We show that the principal morphodynamic modes corresponded well with the respective modes of BSS found at both sites. Tide-induced BSS was the dominant force at both sites, regardless of the level of wave exposure. The overall erosional and steepening trend found at the two flats can be attributed to the prevailing action of tidal forcing and reduced sediment supply. Hence, EOF analysis confirmed that tidal flat morphodynamics are consistent with DET, providing both field and model evidence to support this theory. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据