4.7 Article

Warm and cold wet states in the western United States during the Pliocene-Pleistocene

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 46, 期 4, 页码 355-358

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G39962.1

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-1450357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The size distribution of lakes records the competition between precipitation delivery and evaporation. Lakes were abundant in the terminally draining basins of the western United States (USA) during both the colder-than-preindustrial latest Pleistocene glacial period (ca. 14-29 ka) and the warmer-than-preindustrial mid-Pliocene (ca. 2.9-3.3 Ma). To understand the hydroclimatic conditions that permitted lakes, we couple lake mass balance equations with a water and energy balance framework (sensu Budyko). Further, we compare paleo-lake area distributions to forward-modeled lake areas using climate model simulations of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, 19-26 ka) and mid-Pliocene. We conclude that both warmer-and colderthan-modern periods of the Pliocene-Pleistocene resulted in wetter-than-modern conditions in the terminally draining basins of the western USA through similar mechanisms. Specifically, the presence of lakes during the LGM reflects increased precipitation in addition to decreased evaporative demand. In the southern Great Basin, LGM lakes require large increases in precipitation across the region. During the mid-Pliocene, increased evaporative demand necessitated increased precipitation to maintain lakes. Further, the increase in precipitation and dominantly southwestern distribution of mid-Pliocene lake deposits is consistent with proposed mean El Nino-like conditions altering regional hydroclimate during this period. These observations suggest that during interglacial periods, the western USA resides within a local aridity maximum, and both long-term increases and decreases in global temperatures have been associated with wetter conditions across much of the western USA in the past.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据