4.0 Article

Shock heterogeneity and shock history of the recently found ordinary Csatalja chondrite in Hungary

期刊

GEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY
卷 62, 期 2, 页码 433-446

出版社

POLISH GEOLOGICAL INST
DOI: 10.7306/gq.1416

关键词

meteorite; shock impact alteration; ordinary chondrite; infrared and Raman spectroscopy

类别

资金

  1. NKFIH [GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00003]
  2. MTA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shock impact-produced mineral alterations in two thin sections of the recently found Csatalja H4 ordinary chondrite meteorite are compared. Peak positions of Raman and infrared spectra of mineral clasts show peaks shifted in wavenumber relative to unshocked reference minerals, and both peak shifts and FWHM values seem to correlate to each other. In the less shocked thin section (Csatalja-1) a more monomineralic and homogeneous composition indicate shock pressures of <15 GPa, while the more shocked Csatalja-2 indicates shock pressure in the 15-17 GPa range. The highest identified infrared peak position shifts range between 48 and +28 cm(-1) with peak broadening between 60-84 cm(-1) in the case of the feldspars, which, together with sulphide globules, were produced by the shock itself. Feldspar spectra could be detected only by FTIR spectroscopy, but in most cases (above the S3 shock level) the mixed type of the pyroxene-feldspar spectra (both peaks in the same spectra) is in agreement with the shock-produced secondary feldspars. These grains are located around crystalline borders, and probably formed by selective melting, due to shock annealing. In reconstruction of the shock history, an early fragmentation by a lower shock effect and a later increased shock level-related vein and melt pocket formation occurred, with subsequent shock annealing; temporal reconstruction of the shock event is possible only in part. The joint usage of Raman and infrared spectroscopy provided useful insights into the shock-produced changes and their spatial inhomogeneity, while shocked feldspar could be better detected by infrared than by the Raman method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据